The problems this exists to solve.
How it works for your team, day to day.
Inspection at the moment of paste
AccuroAI evaluates the prompt inside the browser before it transmits — 40+ classifiers covering PII, PHI, payment data, credentials, and source code, at sub-38ms. Sensitive fields are redacted inline, so the employee still gets their answer and the raw data never reaches OpenAI.
Every tier, every account type
Coverage doesn't depend on which plan the employee is on. Enterprise, Team, Plus, and personal free accounts are all governed the same way at the browser boundary — which matters, because the riskiest usage is almost never on the sanctioned Enterprise tenant.
A record you can hand to an auditor
Every interaction logs who, what tool, which classifier fired, and what action was taken — mapped to the 8 supported compliance frameworks. When someone asks 'is our ChatGPT use GDPR-defensible?', the answer is a report, not a shrug.
The questions we hear most.
Should we just buy ChatGPT Enterprise instead?
ChatGPT Enterprise solves training-use and tenant isolation — for the accounts inside it. It does nothing about the personal accounts your employees already have, other AI tools, or your own data-classification policies. AccuroAI governs the boundary regardless of plan.
Does redaction break the answer quality?
Rarely in practice — names, IDs, and secrets are masked with typed placeholders, and the model works with the structure it needs. The task completes; the raw values stay home.
What about GPTs and file uploads?
Custom GPTs are inventoried and can be allowed or blocked individually; attached files are scanned with the same classifier set before upload.
Can we start with visibility only?
Yes — observe mode logs what would have been redacted without touching anything. Most teams run it for a week, then turn on enforcement with evidence in hand. The 72-hour pilot covers exactly this.